2/2/2024 0 Comments Android tweetbot![]() The problem with Twitter for iPad, I believe, is that it failed to appeal power users in the long term, stalling on the same feature set it had at launch without adding substantial improvement over what could have been a fantastic application. ![]() You can read more about it in my original review from 2010. Taking the best features of Twitter for iPhone (fluidity, clean design, pull to refresh) and mixing them up with new interaction schemes such as panels and pinch gestures, Twitter for iPad collected rave reviews and considerable disapprovals because of its interesting use of classic Twitter elements (vertical timeline, separate section for Mentions) alongside a new model for driving users’ taps around the app in the form of sliding panels, modal menus, and popovers. In 2010, Twitter also released its very own application for the iPad developed by Loren Brichter, the man behind Tweetie, Twitter for iPad launched to a (still ongoing) controversy as to whether iPad interfaces should adopt more courageous designs in displaying information and sections to the user. Some notable Twitter clients came out on the iPad throughout 2010, including the excellent Twitterrific, which we have reviewed several times on MacStories. Twitter clients for iPhone and Mac had reached a kind of maturity and complexity that enabled users like me to demand a certain grade of efficiency from new Twitter apps for the tablet Twitter itself was beefing up its first-party app portfolio with acquisitions and a fresh strategy based on making the official clients the go-to apps for the average Twitter user. Tweetbot for iPad is the better Twitter app I have been waiting for, and it sets a new standard that future Twitter clients will have to be compared with.įrom a Twitter power user’s perspective, the iPad came at an interesting point in the history of the platform. Otherwise, I'm not going to gamble $13 that I'm going to like it.Since its release two years ago, the iPad has always needed a better Twitter client. ![]() If I could at least try TweetBot, I could then make an informed decision based on experience to buy the app. But other app developers like TweetBot don't offer limited free versions, opting to go for a paid-or-nothing model instead, and I feel like they're losing out on potential users by asking a lot more money than we're willing to pay for an app without offering some sort of trial. Some app developers make free, basic versions of their apps that don't have the same "premium" features as the paid version, and the free versions often have annoying ads while the premium versions don't. I went back to the watch face's store page in the Google Play Store and saw it was an option to get a refund.Īnd just like that, the watch face uninstalled itself and I got my money back. I bought one I thought I liked, but realized when I opened it that the watch face didn't quite work aesthetically with the Android Wear watch I had. I first experienced Google's Play Store refund and return policy when trying out different watch faces for an Android Wear watch. Two hours isn't exactly enough time to fully evaluate whether you'd like an app or not, but it's something, and I don't need to write in and plead with a company to give me my money back. If there was an Android version of TweetBot, I'd be able to pay for the app and get a no-questions-asked refund within two hours of installing it on my phone. This chart from BI Intelligence gives you a good idea how much people are willing to pay for apps: And that's a price drop from the previous version of the app, which costs $20! And yes, I'm willing to spend $650 for a smartphone, but I won't pay $13 for an app I haven't myself tried before. That's because $650 is what premium smartphones generally cost, and I know what I'm getting with a new $650 phone. TweetBot looks like it has a nicer, cleaner interface than TweetDeck, and I'd like to check out how it's better.īut for $13? No way. That's why my colleague Alex Heath's article about TweetBot intrigued me. But I'm always open to explore new ways to keep on top of the news. Suffice it to say, I think TweetDeck is a pretty important tool. ![]() Those columns tell me what's going on, and I personally, as well as professionally, need to know what's going on. The columns I've arranged of constantly incoming tweets are like the descending green code from The Matrix. The free TweetDeck desktop app is one of my main windows to the world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |